Cybercrime is rampant in Organizations
Multiple studies have
shown that cybercrime is one of the top three types of reported
economic crime globally. The offense includes but not limited to cyber
espionage, cyber war, cyber disruptions and cyber terrorism. They lead to
erosion of reputation, financial loss and even loss of personal identifiable
information among other severe losses. On the other hand, research by several
academicians has also found that most senior people in organizations are not
placing enough emphasis on the importance of managing cyber-crime threats.
Cases of crackers (I don’t call them hackers) success in cracking websites
from which they siphon stolen funds are largely blamed on victim’s lack of
awareness regarding cybercrime threats and the consequences. Many
organizations’ security policies do not cover areas like social media many of
which provide loopholes for exploitation by cyber criminals. When I wrote the article http://www.contadorharrison.com/cybercrime-is-a-critical-threat-to-developing-countries/ the feedback from readers was a clear indication cybercrime is menace for
governments same as organizations. A recent global survey established that more
than 60% of their respondents admitted their organizations do not monitor the
use of social media sites.
The rampant growth of the so-called
“underground economy” has made obtaining illegal funds a cakewalk. For those
unaware, the underground economy involves sellers, buyers, and illicit markets.
Crooks involved in such businesses, always ask for credit and debit card
information, financial accounts, withdrawal services, theft of identity and
photography, retail accounts, website accounts, spam and phishing information,
server accounts, compromised computers, malicious applications among many other
details. Usage of Internet by criminals has continued to increase
the difficulty of investigating crimes and prosecuting the offenders. There are
very many difficulties in identifying the perpetrators as well as a number of
jurisdiction problems during investigation and prosecution stages. Just ask any
financial crimes investigators about their work and most of them will tell you
financial crimes can predicate offense to more dangerous offenses signifying need
for organizations to invest more in crime prevention measures.
Unfortunately, for any organizations
planning to invest in crime prevention measures the technology cost is
prohibitive and hence many are reluctant to do so. Whether an organization
consider long term or mid term benefits of investing in security technology or
not, most of them view such an investment as a waste of money in terms of
prevention measures which is not the case. In practical terms, research has
shown that large organizations are more likely to suffer fraud and related
crimes because they have more areas they operate, huge number of employees and assets,
and the fact that they deal with more vendors. I strongly believe that
investing in crime prevention measures is equivalent to other investments that
improve organization’s efficiency hence reducing the risk of incurring loss
from cybercrime attacks that mostly lead to industrial espionage. Furthermore,
many studies conducted globally have revealed that any organization with high
level of security has positive influence on customers’ appetite to transact
with such an organization.
Comments
Post a Comment